Claims

Reflective journal writing significantly improved the learning strategies subscale of self-regulation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the learning strategies subscale after the intervention. → Nawar M. Al-Rawahi & Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi 2015

Evidence

Nawar M. Al-Rawahi & Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi 2015

Nawar M. Al-Rawahi & Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi. (2015). The Effect of Reflective Science Journal Writing on Students' Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 367-379. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1069260

q2 · i? · causal · r2

ANCOVA on post-administration learning-strategies scores with pre-test as covariate gave F=6.35, p=0.02 for Method of Instruction. Post means were 3.70 (experimental, n=32) versus 3.27 (control, n=30).

"Table 3 shows these results, and they indicate that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of participants’ self -regulation strategies in both scales (i.e. motivation and learning strategies) and in the overall score."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.