Claims

Tenth-grade students who wrote structured reflective science journals significantly outperformed control students on overall self-regulation strategies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After an eight-week intervention, the journal-writing experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the overall self-regulation strategies measure (ANCOVA controlling for pre-test). → Nawar M. Al-Rawahi & Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi 2015

Evidence

Nawar M. Al-Rawahi & Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi 2015

Nawar M. Al-Rawahi & Sulaiman M. Al-Balushi. (2015). The Effect of Reflective Science Journal Writing on Students' Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 367-379. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1069260

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pre-post control group quasi-experiment with 62 tenth-grade students (32 experimental, 30 control) in a public female school in Oman, analyzed with ANCOVA using the pre-test as covariate. The experimental group's post mean was "M=3.96; SD=0.37" versus the control's 3.62; the overall-score ANCOVA gave F=8.65, p=0.005.

"Participants in the journal -writing group (experimental group) (M=3.96; SD=0.37) significantly outperformed participants in the control group (M=3.62; SD=0.28) with respect to their self -regulation strategies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.