Claims

Judd argued that mental tests aimed at concrete products rather than processes of mental development have proven futile for education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 1910 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Tests measuring products rather than processes miss differences in degree of development in motor coordination behind equal products. → Bingham 1910 q1 i? Experiments on skill acquisition show that acquiring with knowledge of the changes has value lacking when the learner is unaware of the improvement, with identical subject-matter acquired. → Bingham 1910 (2)

Evidence

Bingham 1910

Bingham, W. Van Dyke. (1910). Educational Psychology at the Boston Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071377

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

A theoretical argument presented by Judd in his paper on the application of the experimental method to problems in education, contending that two writing samples equal in legibility and beauty may reflect "vastly different degrees of development in motor coordination".

"One reason, said Professor Judd, why so much of the recent work upon mental tests has proven futile and valueless for education is found in the fact that it has been directed toward concrete products, instead of toward the ability to improve."

Bingham 1910 (2)

Bingham, W. Van Dyke. (1910). Educational Psychology at the Boston Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071377

q1 · i? · review · r1

Judd's reported experimental evidence, cited in his conference paper as showing a value of "acquisition with knowledge of the changes" that is absent when learners are unaware of the nature of the improvement.

"For example, experiments upon the acquisition of skill have shown that acquisition with knowledge of the changes has a value which is lacking where the learner is unaware of the nature of the improvement, although the subject-matter acquired is identical in the two cases."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id judd-processes-not-products-in-measurement
title Judd argued that mental tests aimed at concrete products rather than processes of mental development have proven futile for education
description Judd argued that mental tests aimed at concrete products rather than processes of mental development have proven futile for education
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1910
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — bingham-1910, bingham-1910-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.