Claims

Jumping task based on CPS produces higher problem-solving ability than sharing task based on CPS, which in turn outperforms conventional instruction, in eighth-grade mathematics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Post-test problem-solving ability differed significantly across the three classes, with experimental class x1 (jumping task + CPS) > x2 (sharing task + CPS) > x3 (conventional). → Hobri 2020 q3 i? The omnibus F-test showed significant variance differences in problem-solving ability among the three classes. → Hobri 2020 (2)

Evidence

Hobri 2020

Hobri, Ummah, I. K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik (2020). The Effect of Jumping Task Based on Creative Problem Solving on Students’ Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparisons following a significant F-test on post-test scores of three classes of 34 students each. The printed mean differences were 11.235 (x1 vs x2), 19.588 (x1 vs x3), and 8.353 (x2 vs x3), all marked significant.

"From these results, it can be concluded that the experimental class (x 1) has more significant influence than experiment class (x2) and the control class (x3) and experiment class (x2) have more significant influence than the control class (x 3)."

Hobri 2020 (2)

Hobri, Ummah, I. K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik (2020). The Effect of Jumping Task Based on Creative Problem Solving on Students’ Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a

q3 · i? · causal · r2

ANOVA (F-test) on post-test problem-solving scores of the three classes (N = 102 total per the printed df), conducted after normality and homogeneity checks passed; the article reports sig. 0.000 at the 0.05 level.

"Table 11 shows the variant test result of problem -solving abilities gained sig.0.000, which is less than the significant level of 0.05."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.