Claims

During jumping task based on CPS lessons, 44% of experimental-class students were rated strongly active and 29% active by observers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Observation of the experimental class found most students active or strongly active during jumping task based on CPS implementation. → Hobri 2020

Evidence

Hobri 2020

Hobri, Ummah, I. K., Yuliati, N., & Dafik (2020). The Effect of Jumping Task Based on Creative Problem Solving on Students’ Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 387-406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13126a

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Observation of all 34 students in experimental class x1 by 12 observers using a five-point Likert scale (very active to very inactive); percentages are descriptive with no inferential test reported.

"It is found that the highest scor e of observation criteria reaches 44% of research subjects which indicates that, during jumping task based on CPS implementation. Students are strongly active to engage with the problem solving and 29% of students reach the active level, and the rest of 12 % are in hesitate, inactive, and very inactive."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.