Oral narrative connectedness in June positively correlates with phonological awareness, reading comprehension, and word accuracy measured in October.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-27 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Significant positive Spearman correlations were found between June (third assessment) narrative connectedness (LCC and LSC) and October (fifth assessment) phonological awareness, reading comprehension, and word accuracy, after multiple-comparison correction. → Bárbara Malcorra 2024
Evidence¶
Bárbara Malcorra 2024¶
Bárbara Malcorra, Marina Ribeiro, Luísa Jensen, Giovana Gomes, Tamara Meletti & Natália Bezerra Mota. (2024). Speech connectedness predicts reading performance three months in advance: a longitudinal experiment. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00248-4
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Spearman correlation analysis (corrected alpha = 0.025; Bonferroni across six comparisons, corrected α = 0.0083) relating graph attributes from the March and June sessions to October reading measures; the figure matrix prints values such as 0.22 and 0.23 for the LCC/LSC–word accuracy and related cells, marked significant.
"Significant Spearman positive correlations between reading performance and LCC and LSC were found. Connectedness from oral narratives in June (third assessment) positively corre lated with phonological awareness, reading comprehension, and word accuracy taken in October (fifth assessment) (Fig.1d)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Oral Language — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Oral narrative connectedness predicts reading performance 3–4 months in advance for phonological awareness, reading accuracy, and text comprehension, but not reading fluency. — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- School enrollment is associated with narrative connectedness development: the RE-decrease/LCC-LSC-increase dynamic was interrupted by mid-year vacations and resumed after return to school. — related
- Girls showed higher oral narrative connectedness than boys, with a different pattern of association with reading performance. — related
- Single-point connectedness measures from three stories are stable across the study period. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
june-connectedness-correlates-october-reading |
title |
Oral narrative connectedness in June positively correlates with phonological awareness, reading comprehension, and word accuracy measured in October. |
description |
Oral narrative connectedness in June positively correlates with phonological awareness, reading comprehension, and word accuracy measured in October. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-27 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bárbara-malcorra-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.