Claims

Empirical evidence surrounding innovative technology-enhanced-learning practices in K-12 education is at best patchy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The empirical evidence surrounding innovative technology-enhanced-learning practices in K-12 education is at best patchy, motivating the review. → Burden 2019

Evidence

Burden 2019

Burden, K, Kearney, M, Schuck, S & Hall, A (2019). Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school-aged students: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.008

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

The review states as its motivating problem that evidence for innovative technology-enhanced learning in K-12 education is "at best patchy"; the article offers this as its opening characterization of the field rather than as a tested result.

"The empirical evidence surrounding innovative technology-enhanced-learning practices in K-12 education is at best patchy."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id k12-innovative-tel-evidence-patchy
title Empirical evidence surrounding innovative technology-enhanced-learning practices in K-12 education is at best patchy
description Empirical evidence surrounding innovative technology-enhanced-learning practices in K-12 education is at best patchy
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — burden-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.