K-12 and higher education show distinct, non-overlapping sets of co-occurring data practices¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Association analyses revealed distinct sets of co-occurring data practices in K–12 and higher education with no overlapping association rules: higher education emphasized second-hand data analysis, while K–12 focused on first-hand data production with hypothesis development, argumentation, and sharing. → Jina Kang 2026
Evidence¶
Jina Kang 2026¶
Jina Kang, Chungsoo Na, Morgan Diederich, Hillary Swanson, Lili Yan. (2026). Cultivating science data literacy in K-16 science education through data practices: A systematic review. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09803-5
q3 · i? · review · r2
Association analysis of data practice facets by grade level (Fig. 6), aggregating studies into K–12 (n = 19) and higher education (n = 21) with two mixed-level studies excluded. The review reports no overlapping association rules between the two categories and characterizes K–12 as emphasizing contextual understanding and hands-on approaches.
"Notably, the results revealed distinct sets of co-occurring data practices in K–12 and higher education, with no overlapping association rules (i.e., no common combinations of practices) observed across the two categories. Higher education predominantly emphasized second-hand data analysis (e.g., using given data, applying statistics or computational methods, and selecting methods), while K–12 focused on first-hand data (i.e., producing their own data ) along with other data practices such as developing hypotheses, identifying variables , gathering information , making data-driven arguments , synthesizing results, and sharing results."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Data type shapes practice emphasis: first-hand data aligns with problem understanding and experiment design, second-hand data with statistical analysis and synthesis — related
- At the facet level, visualizing data is the most prevalent facet and co-occurs with applying statistics and synthesizing results — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
k12-versus-higher-education-distinct-data-practice-patterns |
title |
K-12 and higher education show distinct, non-overlapping sets of co-occurring data practices |
description |
K-12 and higher education show distinct, non-overlapping sets of co-occurring data practices |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jina-kang-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.