Claims

Kaufman et al. found significantly more PBL students retained or switched to an interest in primary care during medical school (P = 0.05)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Significantly more PBL students retained an interest in a career in primary care (P = 0.05) and significantly more PBL students switched to an interest in primary care during medical school (P = 0.05). → Tsigarides Jordan 2017

Evidence

Tsigarides Jordan 2017

Tsigarides Jordan, Wingfield Laura R., Kulendran Myutan. (2017). Does a PBL-based medical curriculum predispose training in specific career paths? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Research Notes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219658/

q2 · i? · review · r3

Study of final-year medical students (n = 511) at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine examining self-reported student interest in specialties and how this changes throughout medical school with a PBL vs non-PBL curriculum. The review reports both retention and switching findings at P = 0.05.

"They found that significantly more PBL students retained an interest in a career in primary care (P = 0.05) and significantly more PBL students switched to an interest in primary care during medical school (P = 0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.