Claims

One study found significantly fewer PBL graduates working in primary care, with the authors suggesting medical school admission as a confounding factor

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Tolnai et al. found significantly fewer graduates from a PBL curriculum working in primary care (P = 0.05), the only study showing this association. → Tsigarides Jordan 2017

Evidence

Tsigarides Jordan 2017

Tsigarides Jordan, Wingfield Laura R., Kulendran Myutan. (2017). Does a PBL-based medical curriculum predispose training in specific career paths? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Research Notes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5219658/

q2 · i? · review · r2

Retrospective cohort study comparing 342 graduates from two Canadian medical schools, McMaster University (PBL) and University of Ottawa (non-PBL). The review reports "significantly fewer graduates from a PBL curriculum working in primary care" (P = 0.05).

"They found that there were significantly fewer graduates from a PBL curriculum working in primary care (P = 0.05). This was the only study showing this association."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.