Claims

KERMIT was effective in two evaluation studies with university database-course students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · checked against its sources 2026-10-27 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Two evaluation studies with students taking database courses showed KERMIT to be an effective system. → Pramuditha Suraweera 2004

Evidence

Pramuditha Suraweera 2004

Pramuditha Suraweera, Antonija Mitrovic. (2004). An Intelligent Tutoring System for Entity Relationship Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00197310

q2 · i? · design · r?

The abstract reports two evaluation studies conducted "in the context of genuine teaching activities" with database-course students, concluding KERMIT is effective. No effect sizes or test statistics are given in the available text.

"We present the results of two evaluation studies with students taking database courses, which show that KERMIT is an effective system."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id kermit-evaluation-studies-effective
title KERMIT was effective in two evaluation studies with university database-course students
description KERMIT was effective in two evaluation studies with university database-course students
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2004
source_checked 2026-10-27
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pramuditha-suraweera-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.