Claims

Common serious mispronunciations of Indonesian learners stem from absent L1 phonemes and different sound categorisation in the L1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Moedjito and Ito (2008) attribute common serious mispronunciations to (1) absence of the English phoneme in the learners' mother tongue and (2) different categorisation of the same sounds in English and the L1. → Moedjito 2017

Evidence

Moedjito 2017

Moedjito. (2017). Improving EFL Learners' Pronunciation of English through Quiz-Demonstration-Practice-Revision (QDPR). English Language Teaching, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p10

q1 · i? · causal · r1

The article reports this attribution to Moedjito and Ito (2008) and illustrates it with Sasak-speaking participants confusing /f/, /v/ and /p/ (e.g., saying /paɪp/ for five) and treating /iː/ and /ɪ/ as allophones of one L1 phoneme. No new data on this is collected in the present study.

"two main reasons for these common and serious mispronunciations, namely (1) the absence of English phoneme in EFL learners' mother tongue, and (2) different categorization of the same sounds in English and EFL learners' mother tongue"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.