Claims

Indonesian EFL teachers and students perceived segmentals (consonants and vowels) as the top priority for pronunciation teaching, contrary to the suprasegmental trend

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A survey by Moedjito (2008) found Indonesian secondary teachers and students preferred teaching/learning consonants and vowels over other components, while phonetic transcription and rhythm were not the main priority. → Moedjito 2017

Evidence

Moedjito 2017

Moedjito. (2017). Improving EFL Learners' Pronunciation of English through Quiz-Demonstration-Practice-Revision (QDPR). English Language Teaching, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p10

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The article cites its author's prior survey (Moedjito, 2008) as background motivation; the article attributes this finding to that earlier study, which is not reported in methodological detail here. It notes the finding conflicts with the 1990s trend favouring suprasegmentals.

"a survey conducted by Moed jito (2008) indicated that both Indonesian secondary school teachers and students perceived that both c onsonants and vowels were still the most preferable components to teach/learn"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.