Enrichment benefits on children's L2 vocabulary persist up to 6 months post-learning without diminishing relative to non-enriched learning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? There was no significant learning condition × time point interaction, indicating enrichment benefits held at 3 days, 2 months, and 6 months. → Brian Mathias 2022

Evidence¶

Brian Mathias 2022¶

Brian Mathias, Christian Andrä, Anika Schwager, Manuela Macedonia, Katharina von Kriegstein. (2022). Twelve- and Fourteen-Year-Old School Children Differentially Benefit from Sensorimotor- and Multisensory-Enriched Vocabulary Training. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09648-z

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed effects modeling of composite scores across the three testing time points in the 75-child intervention. Both gesture- and picture-enriched learning benefited outcomes "irrespective of testing time point and children's grade level", despite teachers omitting the L2 stimuli from lessons for 6 months.

"there was no significant interaction between learning condition and time point (χ 2 (4, N = 75) = 4.29, p = 0.37, v = 0.12)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Picture and gesture enrichment benefit children's learning of both concrete and abstract L2 words — related
• Gesture-enriched learning improves 8-year-olds' L2 vocabulary translation and free recall compared with non-enriched learning, persisting up to 6 months — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Both gesture and picture enrichment enhanced children's test performance compared with non-enriched learning, with benefits persisting up to 6 months for concrete and abstract words — a broader claim this one bears on
• Gesture and picture enrichment produced similar benefits on children's L2 vocabulary learning, contrary to adult findings favoring gestures — related