Claims

LA is used in higher-education feedback studies for a range of objectives beyond improving feedback itself, with reflection the most common (43% of studies)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across 46 reviewed studies, LA feedback objectives included reflection (43%), personalization (28%), prediction (24%), assessment (24%), adaptation (22%), recommendation (22%) and monitoring (13%). → Seyyed Kazem Banihashem 2022

Evidence

Seyyed Kazem Banihashem 2022

Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, Omid Noroozi, Stan van Ginkel, Leah P. Macfadyen, Harm J.A. Biemans. (2022). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489

q2 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review of 46 studies coded with a four-category scheme (inter-rater agreement κ = 0.84). The review reports that objectives "have gone beyond sole improvements of feedback practices"; Table 4 lists reflection in 20 studies (43%) and personalization in 13 (28%).

"The objectives we found for the use of LA in feedback studies have gone beyond sole improvements of feedback practices in higher education and it has included additional pedagogical objectives."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id la-feedback-objectives-reflection-most-common
title LA is used in higher-education feedback studies for a range of objectives beyond improving feedback itself, with reflection the most common (43% of studies)
description LA is used in higher-education feedback studies for a range of objectives beyond improving feedback itself, with reflection the most common (43% of studies)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — seyyed-kazem-banihashem-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.