Claims

Most implementing institutions lacked a clear LA strategy, and many used LA to support wider university strategy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2025: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 15 survey respondents with existing LA implementation, 7 had no clear strategy; 32 interview participants reported LA supporting wider university strategy rather than a dedicated LA strategy. → Tsai 2020

Evidence

Tsai 2020

Tsai, Yi-Shan, et al. (2020). Learning Analytics in European Higher Education – Trends and Barriers. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103933

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Survey data show "among the 15 survey respondents that indicated existing implementation of LA in their institutions, 7 did not have a clear strategy to work towards the goal of LA"; 32 interview participants reported LA supporting wider university strategies.

"among the 15 survey respondents that indicated existing implementation of LA in their institutions, 7 did not have a clear strategy to work towards the goal of LA"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.