Claims

Group differences in total feedback time per teaching episode were large, with partial eta-squared ranging from .256 to .707 across the eight weeks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Partial eta-square statistics for total feedback time ranged from .256 (episode one) to .707 (episode six), indicating group membership explained a large proportion of variance. → Andrews 2011

Evidence

Andrews 2011

Andrews, A., Bobo, L., & Spurlock, A. (2011). Use of video feedback in the training of pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. (no URL printed in the article text). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056349

q3 · i3 · causal · r1

Effect-size reporting in the Results section of the eight-week randomized experiment: the printed effect sizes were partial η² = .256 (Teaching Episode One) rising to η² = .707 (Teaching Episode Six), both far above the η² ≥ .14 large threshold.

"Partial eta-square statistics for total feedback time per teaching episode ranged from .256 (Teaching Episode One) to .707 (Teaching Episode Six)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.