Claims

Individual slopes of the trained task correlated significantly with slopes of the odd-one-out and following-instructions transfer tasks but not with the math task

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 The slope of Grid correlated significantly with the slopes of OOO (0.53 ± 0.17) and FI (0.43 ± 0.13), while no significant correlation with the Math slope (−0.04 ± 0.10) was observed. → Julia Ericson and Torkel Klingberg 2023

Evidence

Julia Ericson and Torkel Klingberg 2023

Julia Ericson and Torkel Klingberg. (2023). A dual-process model for cognitive training. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00161-2

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

Multivariate latent growth curve model of improvement on the 4 tasks in 1300 children (RMSEA = 0.034, CFI = 0.987). The article reports significant slope correlations of "OOO (0.53 ± 0.17) and FI (0.43 ± 0.13)"; the printed correlation r = 0.53 corresponds to a large effect.

"we observed signi ficant correlations between the slopes of the trained task and two of the transfer tasks (Fig. 4b), OOO (0.53 ± 0.17) and FI (0.43 ± 0.13), validating our hypothesis that the slope of Grid was related to the slopes of OOO and FI."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.