Claims

Working memory training improvement decomposes into an early task-specific process accounting for 44% of the total increase and a slower capacity improvement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Factor analyses of training and transfer data suggested two separate processes: an early task-specific improvement accounting for 44% of the total increase, and a slower capacity improvement. → Julia Ericson and Torkel Klingberg 2023

Evidence

Julia Ericson and Torkel Klingberg 2023

Julia Ericson and Torkel Klingberg. (2023). A dual-process model for cognitive training. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00161-2

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Confirmatory factor analysis of performance data from 1300 children on the trained Grid task and 3 transfer tasks (OOO, FI, Math), tested for strict longitudinal measurement invariance. The article reports "an early task-speci fic improvement, accounting for 44% of the total increase, and a slower capacity improvement."

"Factor analyses suggested two separate processes: an early task-speci fic improvement, accounting for 44% of the total increase, and a slower capacity improvement."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.