Claims

Some sentences show imperfect difficulty graduation, with inversions in per cent correct across years

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 1917 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The sixth sentence of Test II shows an inversion in the third year (percents correct 35.9, 61.9, 60.6, 66.2), while the fifth sentence is very satisfactory. → Henmon 1917

Evidence

Henmon 1917

Henmon, V. A. C. (1917). The Measurement of Ability in Latin. Part II. Sentence Tests. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Henmon+Measurement+of+Ability+in+Latin+Sentence+Tests

q2 · i? · design · r2

Item-analysis of percents correct by year for Test II sentences; the fifth sentence's percents (30.9, 48.4, 57.1, 80.8) are cited as very satisfactory by contrast.

"On the other hand the sixth sentence gives the following percentages: 35.9, 61.9, 60.6, 66.2. It shows an inversion in the third year and the graduation is imperfect."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id latin-sentence-difficulty-graduation-inversions
title Some sentences show imperfect difficulty graduation, with inversions in per cent correct across years
description Some sentences show imperfect difficulty graduation, with inversions in per cent correct across years
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1917
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — henmon-1917

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.