Claims

Question difficulty was scored as percentage of correctness, assumed inversely related to difficulty

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 1922 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The scaling method assumes the percentage of pupils answering a question correctly is in inverse ratio to its difficulty, which the author says practically measures the inefficiency of present school methods. → Sackett 1922

Evidence

Sackett 1922

Sackett, L. W. (1922). A Scale in Ancient History. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu

q2 · i? · design · r2

Methodological statement from the article's calculation section, describing the assumption underlying the scaling rather than a tested result. The author concedes the assumption "may not really be true in either case, but practically it is true" for present purposes.

"The percentage of correctness in answering a question is assumed to be in inverse ratio to its difficulty, just as the percentage of those who spell a word is an inverse measure of its difficulty. This may not really be true in either case, but practically it is true"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id percentage-correctness-inverse-difficulty
title Question difficulty was scored as percentage of correctness, assumed inversely related to difficulty
description Question difficulty was scored as percentage of correctness, assumed inversely related to difficulty
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1922
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sackett-1922

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.