Online students value learner-to-instructor engagement strategies most among the three interaction categories¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, and learner-to-content engagement strategies, students rated learner-to-instructor strategies as most valued. → Martin 2018
Evidence¶
Martin 2018¶
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Survey-based study in which "One hundred and fifty five students completed a 38-item survey" rating engagement strategies in the three Moore interaction categories; learner-to-instructor strategies "seemed to be most valued among the three categories." No effect size is printed in the available text.
"One hundred and fifty five students completed a 38-item survey on learner-to-learner, learner-to-instructor, and learner-to-content engagement strategies. Learner-to-instructor engagement strategies seemed to be most valued among the three categories."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students rated regular announcements/e-mail reminders and grading rubrics for all assignments as the most beneficial learner-to-instructor strategies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A meta-analysis quantitatively verified the importance of three types of interaction in distance and online learning: among students, between instructor and students, and between students and content — a broader claim this one bears on
- Learner-instructor and learner-content engagement strategies are negatively associated with digital distraction in online courses — related
- Perceptions of engagement strategies were analyzed for differences by age, gender, and online learning experience
- Students rated icebreaker/introduction discussions and collaborative work with online communication tools as the most beneficial learner-to-learner strategies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Students rated real-world projects and discussions with structured or guiding questions as the most beneficial learner-to-content strategies — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
learner-to-instructor-strategies-most-valued-online |
title |
Online students value learner-to-instructor engagement strategies most among the three interaction categories |
description |
Online students value learner-to-instructor engagement strategies most among the three interaction categories |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — martin-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.