Participants who improved on audiovisual speech-in-noise comprehension had significantly lower pre-training scores than non-learners, reflecting the inherent correlation between baseline and change scores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Learners scored significantly lower at pre-training than non-learners in the audiovisual condition (OR = 0.54, 95% CI[0.33, 0.90], p = 0.018). → Raffael Schmitt 2023

Evidence¶

Raffael Schmitt 2023¶

Raffael Schmitt, Martin Meyer and Nathalie Giroud. (2023). Improvements in naturalistic speech-in-noise comprehension in middle-aged and older adults after 3 weeks of computer-based speechreading training. npj Science of Learning 8:32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-023-00179-6

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Analysis of average audiovisual pre-training scores by learner status, reported in Fig. 4 with the model statistic OR = 0.54, 95% CI[0.33, 0.90], p = .018, suggesting learners perform worse at pre-training than non-learners. The article notes baseline and change scores are inherently correlated in clinical trials.

"Learners and non-learners differed signi ficantly in the pre-training score in both active control and speechreading training group."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Three weeks of computer-based speechreading training improves audiovisual speech-in-noise comprehension in middle-aged and older adults, with the effect limited to the audiovisual condition — related
• Lexical overlap between speechreading training material and test sentences did not significantly account for the observed training effect — related
• Visual enhancement is not significantly associated with hearing level, age, visual working memory or processing speed, and learning rate in speechreading training is not significantly associated with those or with hearing aid use or training intensity — related