Claims

Learners prefer receiving corrective feedback more than teachers feel they should provide it

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across preference research, learners tend to prefer receiving corrective feedback more than teachers feel they should provide it. → Roy Lyster 2013

Evidence

Roy Lyster 2013

Roy Lyster, Kazuya Saito, and Masatoshi Sato. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, Volume 46, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

q2 · i? · review · r?

The review synthesizes questionnaire and perception studies comparing learner and teacher preferences for error correction, reporting "a tendency for learners to prefer receiving CF more than teachers feel they should provide it". The mismatch is characterized as a tendency, not a universal finding.

"Research on CF preferences is then reviewed, revealing a tendency for learners to prefer receiving CF more than teachers feel they should provide it."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id learners-prefer-cf-more-than-teachers-provide
title Learners prefer receiving corrective feedback more than teachers feel they should provide it
description Learners prefer receiving corrective feedback more than teachers feel they should provide it
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2013
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — roy-lyster-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.