Claims

Theoretical perspectives support corrective feedback while contentious issues remain about uptake, instruction, and CF's purpose

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The review presents theoretical perspectives in support of CF and addresses contentious issues about learner uptake, the role of instruction, and whether CF initiates new knowledge or consolidates acquired knowledge. → Roy Lyster 2013

Evidence

Roy Lyster 2013

Roy Lyster, Kazuya Saito, and Masatoshi Sato. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, Volume 46, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's theoretical section presents perspectives supporting CF and explicitly frames three contentious issues: "the role of learner uptake", the role of instruction, and whether CF's purpose is "to initiate the acquisition of new knowledge or to consolidate already acquired knowledge".

"Next, theoretical perspectives in support of CF are presented and some contentious issues addressed related to the role of learner uptake, the role of instruction, and the overall purpose of CF: to initiate the acquisition of new knowledge or to consolidate already acquired knowledge."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id theoretical-perspectives-cf-uptake-instruction-purpose
title Theoretical perspectives support corrective feedback while contentious issues remain about uptake, instruction, and CF's purpose
description Theoretical perspectives support corrective feedback while contentious issues remain about uptake, instruction, and CF's purpose
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — roy-lyster-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.