The interaction between learning model and academic ability significantly affects pre-service teachers' critical thinking skills¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Saputri 2020: groups were assigned but students were analysed as independent (read from the study by two models, 2026-11-01)
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The Learnings * Academic Ability interaction was significant, indicating the effect of learning model depended on academic ability level. → Saputri 2020
Evidence¶
Saputri 2020¶
Saputri, W., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Suwono, H. (2020). QASEE: A potential learning model to improve the critical thinking skills of pre-service teachers with different academic abilities. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 853-864. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.853
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Omnibus ANCOVA interaction term (Learnings * AA) in the 3x3 factorial quasi-experiment; Table 2 prints F = 4.907, Sig. .001, df = 4 for the interaction. The prose reports the p-level as 0,000, a discrepancy with the table value.
"related to the interaction between learning models and academic abilities, the p-level value obtained is 0,000, which is smaller than alpha 0.05. This means that there is a difference in the effect of the interaction of the two variables on the critical thinking skills of pre-service teachers"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Critical thinking skills differ by academic ability, with upper academic ability pre-service teachers scoring highest — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Under conventional learning, pre-service teachers at all ability levels obtain the lowest critical thinking scores, with upper and middle groups statistically equal — related
- The QASEE model equalizes critical thinking outcomes across upper, middle, and lower academic ability groups — related
- Pre-service teachers taught with the QASEE model achieve higher critical thinking scores than those taught with RQA or conventional learning — related
- GenAI-assisted education produces significantly higher higher-order thinking abilities than non-GenAI approaches (g = 0.72) — related
- Unscaffolded GenAI access was not associated with a significant difference in pre-service teachers' critical thinking relative to traditional learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.