Claims

Pre-service teachers taught with the QASEE model achieve higher critical thinking scores than those taught with RQA or conventional learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Corrected mean critical thinking scores were 12.80% higher under QASEE than under RQA and 36.93% higher than under conventional learning. → Saputri 2020

Evidence

Saputri 2020

Saputri, W., Corebima, A. D., Susilo, H., & Suwono, H. (2020). QASEE: A potential learning model to improve the critical thinking skills of pre-service teachers with different academic abilities. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 853-864. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.853

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group study of 107 pre-service teachers in three parallel classes (QASEE, RQA positive control, conventional negative control), analyzed by ANCOVA followed by LSD post hoc tests. The LSD corrected means were 66.046 (QASEE), 58.549 (RQA), and 48.232 (conventional).

"the corrected mean score of the critical thinking skills of pre-service teachers who learned by using the QASEE learning model is 12.80% higher than that of the pre-service teachers who learned by using RQA learning model, and 36.93% higher than that of the pre-service teachers who learned by using conventional learning"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.