Claims

Learning plans helped students as a framework and focus for learning, but effects were limited to setting a wide range of learning objectives and increased focus

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Although learning plans were aimed at the complete SRL cycle, effects were only found in setting a wide range of learning objectives and in increased focus for learning. → van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

Evidence

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A, Berkhout Joris J, van Dijk Nynke, Endedijk Maaike D, Jaarsma A Debbie, Diemers Agnes D. (2018). Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of five studies describing learning plans in which students recorded goals, learning strategies and evidence of goal achievement. The plans helped "as a framework and focus for learning" and increased awareness of the learning process.

"Although this intervention was aimed at the complete SRL cycle, effects were only found in setting a wide range of learning objectives and in increased focus for learning (i.e. regulatory agent and mechanism)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.