Claims

Clinical students' SRL behaviour falls into five distinct patterns, all showing little-planned SRL behaviour and limited goal setting

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Berkhout et al. described five patterns of clinical students' self-assessed SRL behaviour — engaged, critically opportunistic, uncertain, restrained and effortful — and difficulty of clinical learning was reflected in all patterns by little-planned SRL behaviour and limited goal setting. → van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

Evidence

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A 2018

van Houten‐Schat Maaike A, Berkhout Joris J, van Dijk Nynke, Endedijk Maaike D, Jaarsma A Debbie, Diemers Agnes D. (2018). Self‐regulated learning in the clinical context: a systematic review. Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13615

q2 · i? · review · r3

Review reports the Q-methodology study by Berkhout et al. identifying five patterns of clinical students' self-assessed SRL behaviour: "engaged", "critically opportunistic", "uncertain", "restrained" and "effortful", differing in goals, metacognition, communication, effort and dependence on external regulation.

"Results also showed that the difficulty of learning in a clinical context was reflected in all these SRL patterns by the little‐planned SRL behaviour and limited goal setting."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.