Claims

The effect of learning stations differs significantly by education level, largest at primary level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Effect sizes differed significantly by education level (QB=10.083; p=0.006), with primary education highest (1.012), secondary 0.615, and university 0.013. → Mevlut AYDOGMUS & Cihad SENTURK 2019

Evidence

Mevlut AYDOGMUS & Cihad SENTURK 2019

Mevlut AYDOGMUS & Cihad SENTURK. (2019). THE EFFECTS OF LEARNING STATIONS TECHNIQUE ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT: A META-ANALYTIC STUDY. Research in Pedagogy, Vol.9, No.1. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.87

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup analysis of the 16 measurements divided by primary, secondary, and university levels, with average effect sizes of 1.012, 0.615, and 0.013 respectively. The article characterizes these as large, medium, and small effects.

"According to the homogeneity test result, there was a significant difference between the effect size values calculated by education level (Q B=10.083; p=0.006). The average effect on the achievement of the studies done at the primary education level was highest."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.