Claims

The effect of digital technology-assisted STEM education on academic achievement differs significantly by education level, largest at high school and smallest at primary school

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Effect sizes differ significantly across education levels (QB=16.404, p<0.05), with high school (d=3.049) largest and primary school (d=1.257) smallest. → Feyyaz Öztop 2023

Evidence

Feyyaz Öztop 2023

Feyyaz Öztop. (2023). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Digital Technology-Assisted STEM Education. Journal of Science Learning. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v6i2.52316

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Moderator analysis of the 38 effect sizes by education level, reported in Table 4 with subgroup ns of 6, 24, 6, and 2 comparisons. The between-groups test was significant (QB=16.404, p<0.05); subgroup effect sizes ranged from d=1.257 (primary) to d=3.049 (high school).

"As seen in Table 4, the effect sizes were d=1.257 for primary school, d=2.856 for secondary school, d=3.049 for high school, and d=1.916 for university. The most significant effect size belongs to the high school level, and the least effect size belongs to the primary school level. The analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the effect sizes (QB =16.404, p<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.