Learning style (visual-verbal) shows no significant correlation with the effectiveness of pictorial elucidation for adolescent EFL learners¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-10-16 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 Among pictorial-group students, learning style scores correlated nonsignificantly with immediate posttest scores (r = .08) and delayed posttest scores (r = .01). → Lee 2017
Evidence¶
Lee 2017¶
Lee, Sunjung. (2017). Raising EFL learners' awareness of L2 lexical errors and correct usage: A dual coding approach. English Teaching, 72(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.72.2.201706.29
q3 · i0 · causal · r2
Pearson correlations using the validated Index of Learning Styles visual-verbal dimension (scored -11 to +11, α = .76) as a continuous variable found negligible, nonsignificant associations: "r = .08" immediate and "r = .01" delayed.
"for the pictorial group, there was a nonsignificant correlation between learning style and immediate posttest scores (r = .08). There was also a nonsignificant correlation between learning style and delayed posttest scores (r = .01)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Learning-Style Preferences — moderator: an effect differed by reported style in this study; matching to style is not supported overall
Related Claims¶
- Learning Styles Matching Does Not Improve Learning — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Dual coding elucidation raises adolescent EFL learners' awareness of lexical errors and correct usage more than verbal-only elucidation — related
- The advantage of dual coding elucidation for correct lexical usage persists over a four-week delay — related
- The correlation between cognitive processing capacity and test performance is non-significant when using the chunking method — related
- Multimedia glosses improve EFL students' immediate vocabulary acquisition relative to reading the same texts without glosses — related
- Adolescent EFL learners perceive cartoon-based pictorial elucidation as helpful for accurate vocabulary use and engagement — related
- Massa and Mayer's three experiments found no support for matching instruction to visualizer–verbalizer preferences — a broader claim this one bears on
- Correlational meta-analyses of learning styles and achievement average r = 0.24 but do not test or support the matching hypothesis — related
- Meta-analyses testing the matching hypothesis show a negligible overall effect of matching teaching to students' learning styles (d = 0.04) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
learning-style-no-correlation-pictorial-elucidation-effect |
title |
Learning style (visual-verbal) shows no significant correlation with the effectiveness of pictorial elucidation for adolescent EFL learners |
description |
Learning style (visual-verbal) shows no significant correlation with the effectiveness of pictorial elucidation for adolescent EFL learners |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
source_checked |
2026-10-16 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lee-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.