Claims

Among applications for retention of pre-service teachers, the Learning Together Technique had the highest effect size (d=2,0606, huge) and the Jigsaw Technique the lowest (d=0,5461, medium)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Learning Together Technique had the highest retention effect size (d=2,0606, a huge level) in primary school pre-service teachers, while the Jigsaw Technique had the lowest (d=0,5461, a medium level). → Şenel Elaldı 2016

Evidence

Şenel Elaldı 2016

Şenel Elaldı, Veli Batdı. (2016). Comparing Effects of Different Applications on Pre-Service Teachers: A Meta–Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1456

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of studies on retention of pre-service teachers, computed with Hedges' d in MetaWin and classified by Thalheimer and Cook (2002). The review reports "Learning Together Technique had the highest effect size ( d =2,0606" and Jigsaw the lowest (d=0,5461).

"Table 1 shows that, in terms of retention scores, while Learning Together Technique had the highest effect size ( d =2,0606 -a huge level -) in primary school pre -service teachers, the Jigsaw Technique had the lowest one ( d= 0,5461-a medium level -) in pre -service te achers studying in the department of Turkish Education."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.