Claims

Learning Cycle Model, Use of Animation, Reflective Diaries and Multiple Intelligence Theory Based Teaching each had very large retention effect sizes for pre-service teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 In the reviewed retention studies, Learning Cycle Model (d=1,4169), Use of Animation (d=1,3044), Reflective Diaries (d=1,2909) and Multiple Intelligence Theory Based Teaching (d=1,2578) showed very large effect sizes. → Şenel Elaldı 2016

Evidence

Şenel Elaldı 2016

Şenel Elaldı, Veli Batdı. (2016). Comparing Effects of Different Applications on Pre-Service Teachers: A Meta–Analysis. Journal of Education and Training Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i7.1456

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of the nine retention studies reporting Hedges' d values by application. The review reports these four applications each "have a very larg e effect size" under the Thalheimer and Cook (2002) classification.

"In addition, Learning Cycle Model (d= 1,4169); Use of Animation (d=1,3044); Reflective Dairies (d=1,2909); and Multiple Intelligence and Theory Based Teaching ( d= 1,2578) techniques have a very larg e effect size."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.