Claims

Lecturer technology use is positively related to student online cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Lecturer technology use relates positively and significantly to cognitive (β = 0.26), emotional (β = 0.36), and behavioral engagement (β = 0.37). → Hazzam 2023

Evidence

Hazzam 2023

Hazzam, J., & Wilkins, S. (2023). The influences of lecturer charismatic leadership and technology use on student online engagement, learning performance, and satisfaction. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104809

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Same SEM survey study (n = 659); technology use paths to all three engagement dimensions are significant, with the strongest link to "behavioral engagement (β = 0.37, p < .001)".

"The results show that lecturer technology use relates positively and significantly to student's cognitive (β = 0.26, p < .001), emotional (β = 0.36, p < .001), and behavioral engagement (β = 0.37, p < .001), supporting H2a, H2b and H2c."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.