Claims

Legal professionals frequently use free NMT with high self-reported satisfaction yet perform little to no post-editing, so satisfaction is not correlated with quality

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Legal professionals regularly use freely available NMT with high self-reported satisfaction, yet a substantial proportion perform little to no post-editing, indicating user satisfaction is not necessarily correlated with translation quality. → Łucja Biel 2026

Evidence

Łucja Biel 2026

Łucja Biel. (2026). AI Literacy for Legal Translation: Developing Digital Resilience. University of Warsaw. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.04641 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.04641

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The chapter synthesises survey findings it attributes to Setkowicz-Ryszka (2024) in Poland, Kourouni and O'Shea (2025) in Greece, and Girard, Lehoux-Jobin, and Pomerleau (2026) in Canada, reporting that "legal professionals regularly use freely available NMT with high self-reported satisfaction, yet a substantial proportion perform little to no post-editing".

"legal professionals regularly use freely available NMT with high self-reported satisfaction, yet a substantial proportion perform little to no post-editing"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id legal-professionals-overtrust-machine-translation
title Legal professionals frequently use free NMT with high self-reported satisfaction yet perform little to no post-editing, so satisfaction is not correlated with quality
description Legal professionals frequently use free NMT with high self-reported satisfaction yet perform little to no post-editing, so satisfaction is not correlated with quality
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — łucja-biel-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.