Two years of the Lesson Study programme shows no evidence of improving KS2 maths and reading attainment compared to control¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q4·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i0 For the second cohort, two years of Lesson Study had a negligible effect on combined KS2 maths and reading scores (effect size 0.03, not significant). → Murphy et al. 2017
Evidence¶
Murphy et al. 2017¶
Richard Murphy, Felix Weinhardt, Gill Wyness and Heather Rolfe. (2017). Lesson Study: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581145
q4 · i0 · causal · r3
Intention-to-treat analysis for cohort 2 on the same primary outcome in the cluster RCT. The printed effect size is "0.03 ( -0.06 - 0.12)" with p value 0.5 for 6304 pupils; estimated months' progress was 0.
"2 Year of Lesson Study vs. control 0.03 ( -0.06 - 0.12) 0 6304 0.5"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- One year of the Edge Hill Lesson Study programme shows no evidence of improving KS2 maths and reading attainment compared to control — related
- Lesson Study shows no impact on secondary outcomes (individual maths and reading, SPAG, science) twelve months after the programme ends — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.