One year of the Edge Hill Lesson Study programme shows no evidence of improving KS2 maths and reading attainment compared to control¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q4 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q4 i0 For the first cohort, one year of Lesson Study had a negligible effect on the primary outcome of combined KS2 maths and reading scores (effect size 0.02, not significant). → Murphy et al. 2017

Evidence¶

Murphy et al. 2017¶

Richard Murphy, Felix Weinhardt, Gill Wyness and Heather Rolfe. (2017). Lesson Study: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581145

q4 · i0 · causal · r3

Intention-to-treat analysis of the cluster RCT comparing treated and control schools on the primary outcome (combined KS2 maths and reading percentage scores) for cohort 1, using OLS with KS1 covariates and pair fixed effects. The printed effect size is "0.02 (-0.06 – 0.09)" with p value 0.65 for 6437 pupils.

"1 Year of Lesson Study vs. control 0.02 (-0.06 – 0.09) 0 6437 0.65"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Two years of the Lesson Study programme shows no evidence of improving KS2 maths and reading attainment compared to control — related
• Lesson Study shows no impact on secondary outcomes (individual maths and reading, SPAG, science) twelve months after the programme ends — related
• The programme showed no positive effects on secondary outcomes of maths attainment and attitudes to reading, maths, music, and school — related