Claims

The fluency gain's cause is unresolved: it may reflect lexical bundles instruction or simply more paragraph writing practice

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors acknowledge that the experimental group's improvement may have been due to more paragraph writing practice rather than to lexical bundles instruction itself. → Ranjbar 2012

Evidence

Ranjbar 2012

Ranjbar, N., Pazhakh, A., & Gorjian, B. (2012). The Effect of Lexical Bundles on Iranian EFL Learners Linguistic Production Fluency. International Education Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n4p243

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' stated limitation in the conclusion of the Dehloran study: the design cannot separate the effect of bundle instruction from the effect of additional paragraph-writing practice, and no evidence or analysis is offered to resolve the question.

"Another suggestion for further research is to consider whether the improvement of the experimental group students was due to the independent variable of the stud y, lexical bundles teaching methodology or was due to more paragraph writing practice."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.