Claims

Participants in the comparison groups reported that standard Life Orientation lessons did not improve their career adaptability on any of the four constructs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? None of the comparison-group participants stated that Life Orientation lessons improved their career adaptability across concern, control, curiosity or confidence. → A Cook and JG Maree 2016

Evidence

A Cook and JG Maree 2016

A Cook and JG Maree. (2016). Efficacy of using career and self-construction to help learners manage career-related transitions. South African Journal of Education, 36(1), Art. #1225. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n1a1225

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' discussion of the qualitative findings from both schools' comparison groups, who received standard traditional Life Orientation lessons instead of the intervention. Some participants said they relied on other sources, such as the media or significant people, for career adaptability skills.

"None of the partic ipants from either school stated that the Life Orientation lessons improved their career adaptability across any of the four constructs."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.