Claims

A career and self-construction intervention programme helped Grade 11 learners from two contrasting schools manage career-related transitions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participants from both experimental groups reported that the intervention helped them manage career-related transitions and improved their career adaptability. → A Cook and JG Maree 2016

Evidence

A Cook and JG Maree 2016

A Cook and JG Maree. (2016). Efficacy of using career and self-construction to help learners manage career-related transitions. South African Journal of Education, 36(1), Art. #1225. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n1a1225

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative analysis of focus group interviews, journals and observations from a quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test comparison study of 42 intervention learners at two schools. The article reports that participants "displayed improved career adaptability" and managed transitions better after the programme.

"Results revealed that career and self-construction helped the participants from both experimental groups manage career-related transitions. It was also apparent that these participants displayed improved career adaptability after th ey took part in the intervention programme."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.