Claims

A limited group of six students rated the media 94.4% overall, categorized as very valid

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Six students selected by mid-term score level rated the media very valid across attitude, ability, knowledge, understanding, and achievement indicators. → Fajriah and Churiyah 2016

Evidence

Fajriah and Churiyah 2016

Ulfah Nur Fajriah, Madziatul Churiyah. (2016). Utilizing Instructional Media for Teaching Infrastructure Administration. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092480

q2 · i? · design · r2

Limited product tryout questionnaire given to six students classified as high, medium, and low scorers from the control class. Indicator scores ranged from 93.3% to 95%, totaling "94.4% which means ver y valid".

"From the results of the validatio n above, it shows that total of limited students te sting questionnaire validation of 6 randomly selected students received total score of 94.4% which means ver y valid as stated in Table 2 Criteria of Score for media feasi bility according to Riduwan (2011: 15)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.