Claims

Expert validators rated the Corel VideoStudio Pro X7-based media very valid (97.7% material expert, 76.5% media expert) and a limited trial group rated it 93.06%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Material expert, media expert, and limited trial group assessments categorized the developed media as valid to very valid. → Fajriah and Churiyah 2016

Evidence

Fajriah and Churiyah 2016

Ulfah Nur Fajriah, Madziatul Churiyah. (2016). Utilizing Instructional Media for Teaching Infrastructure Administration. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092480

q2 · i? · design · r2

Validation study of the developed multimedia module using expert questionnaires and a limited group trial, scored against Riduwan's feasibility criteria. The article reports "97.7% from material expert, 76.5% from media expert and 93.06% from limited trial group".

"The results showed that the assessment from expert validator and limited group testing to the fourth aspects gained an average sco re 97.7% from material expert, 76.5% from media expert and 93.06% from limited trial group, which means that the media is categorized as very valid and reliable to use."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.