Claims

Listening comprehension achievement significantly predicts vocabulary achievement, explaining about 25% of its variance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the experimental group, listening comprehension post-test scores significantly explained vocabulary post-test scores (F(1,60) = 19.591, p < .01), with about 25% of variance explained. → Berker Bulut 2017

Evidence

Berker Bulut 2017

Berker Bulut, Nuri Karasakaloğlu. (2017). Benefiting from Listening in Vocabulary Development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i12.2688

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Simple linear regression on the experimental group's post-test scores (Table 10): F (1, 60) = 19.591, p=.000. The article reports a positive linear relationship between the two variables via scatter diagram; the article prints no standardized effect size for this finding, so impact is null.

"listening comprehension achievement significantly explained the change in vocabulary achievement (p <.01). It can also be said that about 25% of the total variance related to vocabulary achievement was explained by the students’ listening comprehension achievements"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.