Claims

Active listening training produced a significantly larger vocabulary gain than traditional listening practice in fourth-grade students over eight weeks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The increase in vocabulary achievement of the experimental group was significantly higher than the increase in the control group (Group*Measure interaction F(1,123) = 5.76, p < .05). → Berker Bulut 2017

Evidence

Berker Bulut 2017

Berker Bulut, Nuri Karasakaloğlu. (2017). Benefiting from Listening in Vocabulary Development. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i12.2688

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Two-Way ANOVA for mixed measures on pre-test–post-test Vocabulary Test scores of 62 experimental and 63 control fourth-grade students in a semi-experimental design; the Group*Measure interaction was significant, "[F (1,123) = 5.76, p < .05]". Means rose from 60.67 to 70.22 (experimental) versus 60.09 to 61.92 (control).

"the common effects of the repeated measures factors on the vocabulary achievement levels were significant in the different treatment groups [F (1,123) = 5.76, p < .05]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.