Claims

LLM accuracy does not differ significantly across question languages, ranging from 62% in Polish to 77% in German

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Pooled LLM accuracy ranged from 62% (Polish) to 77% (German) across question languages, and these differences were not statistically significant (P=0.17). → Nouri Haniyeh 2025

Evidence

Nouri Haniyeh 2025

Nouri Haniyeh, Mahdavi Abdollah, Abedi Ali, Mohammadnia Alireza, Hamedan Mahnaz, Amanzadeh Masoud. (2025). Performance of large language models in medical licensing examinations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.36

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Subgroup analysis by question language (English n=21, Spanish n=11, Japanese n=10, Chinese n=7, Polish n=6, German n=5, other n=3 studies). The review reports the range and states the differences "were not statistically significant (P=0.17)"; equivalence was not tested.

"In terms of question language, pooled LLM accuracy ranged from 62% to 77%, with the highest accuracy observed for German and the lowest for Polish. These differences, however, were not statistically significant (P=0.17)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.