Claims

Finger-motion sensor (Leap Motion Controller) operation of angiographic and radiological images was significantly faster than mouse-based operation in observational studies with radiologists and dental students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In an observational study with 11 radiologists, after 30 minutes of practice the average operation time by the finger method was significantly shorter than by the mouse method for angiographic images. → Alvarez-Lopez F 2019 q2 i? In a separate observational study with 14 dental students manipulating 25 images, operation time with the LMC was significantly shorter than with the conventional mouse method. → Alvarez-Lopez F 2019 (2)

Evidence

Alvarez-Lopez F 2019

Alvarez-Lopez F, Maina MF, Saigí-Rubió F. (2019). Use of Commercial Off-The-Shelf Devices for the Detection of Manual Gestures in Surgery: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/11925

q2 · i? · review · r2

Observational study (study [81]) comparing average operation time of a mouse versus a finger-motion sensor, with 11 radiologists observing a simulated clinical case. The review reports the finger method was significantly shorter after 30 min of practice.

"After a practice time of 30 min, the average operation time by the finger method was significantly shorter than that by the mouse method."

Alvarez-Lopez F 2019 (2)

Alvarez-Lopez F, Maina MF, Saigí-Rubió F. (2019). Use of Commercial Off-The-Shelf Devices for the Detection of Manual Gestures in Surgery: Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/11925

q2 · i? · review · r3

Observational study (study [92]) of a motion-sensor system for manipulating radiological images in dentistry with 14 students and 25 images. The review reports significantly shorter operation time with the LMC than with the mouse.

"The operation time with the LMC was significantly shorter than with the conventional method using a mouse."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.