Claims

Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Presentation software, not directly taught but consistently modeled by instructors, showed a noticeable rise in self-reported adoption, with mean increasing from 4.40 to 5.93 between pretest and post-posttest. → Orr 2009

Evidence

Orr 2009

Orr, D., & Mrazek, R. (2009). Developing the level of adoption survey to inform collaborative discussion regarding educational innovation. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, V35(2). https://www.cjlt.ca

q2 · i? · design · r2

In the pilot's descriptive results (n=15), presentation software means and medians increased from 4.40 to 5.93 and 4.00 to 6.00 respectively between pretest and post-posttest, despite the technology not being directly taught; a number of students also selected it as a topic or medium for their major course project.

"The use of this technology was not directly taught to students, but was consistently modeled by instructors throughout the on‐campus course component."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id loa-presentation-software-modeled-not-taught-gain
title Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught
description Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2009
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — orr-2009

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.