Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Presentation software, not directly taught but consistently modeled by instructors, showed a noticeable rise in self-reported adoption, with mean increasing from 4.40 to 5.93 between pretest and post-posttest. → Orr 2009
Evidence¶
Orr 2009¶
Orr, D., & Mrazek, R. (2009). Developing the level of adoption survey to inform collaborative discussion regarding educational innovation. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, V35(2). https://www.cjlt.ca
q2 · i? · design · r2
In the pilot's descriptive results (n=15), presentation software means and medians increased from 4.40 to 5.93 and 4.00 to 6.00 respectively between pretest and post-posttest, despite the technology not being directly taught; a number of students also selected it as a topic or medium for their major course project.
"The use of this technology was not directly taught to students, but was consistently modeled by instructors throughout the on‐campus course component."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-reported average level of technology use rose across three administrations of the LoA survey, though not for every technology — a broader claim this one bears on
- Reported use of bridging/conferencing software showed a significant increase (p<0.001), with mean level rising from 1.00 to 2.60 — related
- Reported videoconferencing adoption rose significantly after practitioners returned to the workplace (p<0.005), with mean level increasing from 2.00 to 4.53 — related
- Colleges adopted new technology platforms to increase efficiencies, but face challenges sustaining their use after the grant ends — related
- Respondent feedback prompted a revised ten-level LoA scale splitting non-use and adding a replacement level, plus a more cyclic adoption model — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
loa-presentation-software-modeled-not-taught-gain |
title |
Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught |
description |
Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — orr-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.