Self-reported average level of technology use rose across three administrations of the LoA survey, though not for every technology¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the pilot study, the author reports that self-reported use increased for all 20 technology categories and that the average level of use rose across the three survey administrations; the article's own appendix table shows exceptions, such as digital video cameras falling from a mean of 4.13 at pretest to 3.60 at posttest. → Orr 2009
Evidence¶
Orr 2009¶
Orr, D., & Mrazek, R. (2009). Developing the level of adoption survey to inform collaborative discussion regarding educational innovation. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, V35(2). https://www.cjlt.ca
q2 · i? · design · r2
Pilot study of a blended graduate course: 26 students were surveyed three times via the LMS, and analysis was restricted to the 15 participants completing all three administrations. Descriptive analysis showed "self‐reported increase of use for all 20 technology categories"; the Appendix table reports the average level of use index rising from 3.01 to 3.97.
"Results (see Appendix ‐ Table 2) indicate self‐reported increase of use for all 20 technology categories, and an increased “average level of use” (average of category means)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learning management system adoption rose from mostly non-use/orientation to routine-through-integration levels by December — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Presentation software adoption rose even though it was modeled by instructors rather than directly taught — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Reported videoconferencing adoption rose significantly after practitioners returned to the workplace (p<0.005), with mean level increasing from 2.00 to 4.53 — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Reported use of bridging/conferencing software showed a significant increase (p<0.001), with mean level rising from 1.00 to 2.60 — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Respondent feedback prompted a revised ten-level LoA scale splitting non-use and adding a replacement level, plus a more cyclic adoption model — related
- Interactive whiteboard results showed shifts between orientation/preparation after returning to schools, raising questions about perceived versus actual use — related
- Early-stage IDC growth shows simplification, linearity, and dogmatism, with focal points shifting from format to content to technology across rounds — related
- Colleges adopted new technology platforms to increase efficiencies, but face challenges sustaining their use after the grant ends — related
- Haitian teachers reported that pilot trainings improved their teaching, classroom management, and use of technology — related
- Learning Studio participation increased students' comfort with, and skills around, the Studio technologies — related
- Among students, longer AI-use experience is monotonically associated with higher perceived usefulness (Spearman's r = 0.327), though self-selection may explain part of the pattern — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
loa-pilot-self-reported-increase-all-20-technologies |
title |
Self-reported average level of technology use rose across three administrations of the LoA survey, though not for every technology |
description |
Self-reported average level of technology use rose across three administrations of the LoA survey, though not for every technology |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — orr-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.