Locus of control is negatively correlated with and predicts subjective well-being, ranking second after self-esteem¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1–r2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Locus of control correlated negatively with subjective well-being (r = -.26) and, in gradual regression, contributed 3.3% of variance after self-esteem (Beta = -.184). → Karatas 2012
q2 i2 The correlation between locus of control and subjective well-being was r = -.26, significant at p<.01. → Karatas 2012 (2)
Evidence¶
Karatas 2012¶
Karatas, Z. & Tagay, O. (2012). Self Esteem, Locus of Control and Multidimensional Perfectionism as the Predictors of Subjective Well Being. International Education Studies, 5(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p131
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Gradual (stepwise) regression analysis (Table 2, n=318) predicting subjective well-being. Locus of control entered second with R2Change of .033 and Beta = -.184; the text reports it followed self-esteem "with 3.3%" of expressed variance. No standardised effect size is printed for this step.
"this is followed by locus of control with 3.3%, perfectionism determined by others with 2.6%, perfecti onism for self with 0.8% and perfectionism for others with 0.1%, respectively"
Karatas 2012 (2)¶
Karatas, Z. & Tagay, O. (2012). Self Esteem, Locus of Control and Multidimensional Perfectionism as the Predictors of Subjective Well Being. International Education Studies, 5(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p131
q2 · i2 · associational · r2
Pearson correlation analysis (Table 1, n=318). The locus-of-control column shows "-.26**" with subjective well-being, i.e. r = -.26, significant at p<.01, indicating a negative relationship.
"Subjective well being 174.35 27.08 - .53** -.26** .09 -.13* -.13*"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-esteem, locus of control and multidimensional perfectionism together significantly predict subjective well-being, jointly accounting for 34.8% of variance, with self-esteem the largest contributor at 28% — related
- Self-esteem is positively correlated with subjective well-being among final-year education faculty students — related
- Perfectionism determined by others and perfectionism for others correlate negatively with subjective well-being, while self-perfectionism does not correlate significantly — related
- Both PSD dimensions explain variance in study engagement and subjective well-being beyond core self-evaluations and PsyCap, with designing competition contributing most to engagement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
locus-of-control-negatively-predicts-subjective-well-being |
title |
Locus of control is negatively correlated with and predicts subjective well-being, ranking second after self-esteem |
description |
Locus of control is negatively correlated with and predicts subjective well-being, ranking second after self-esteem |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — karatas-2012, karatas-2012-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.